Female Survivors of Sexual Abuse at Rikers Island

The Rose M. Singer Center is the primary facility for incarcerated women within the New York City jail system. Located on Rikers Island, the Rose M. Singer Center houses women awaiting trial as well as women serving short sentences. Although the facility is intended to provide safe and humane conditions for female detainees, reports over many years have documented sexual abuse, coercion, retaliation, and other forms of misconduct by correction officers and staff.

Women incarcerated at Rose M. Singer Center are in a uniquely vulnerable position. They rely on correction officers for access to basic needs such as movement within the facility, medical care, food distribution, and communication with the outside world. This power imbalance creates an environment where abuse can occur and where survivors may fear retaliation if they report misconduct. In addition, a significant number of correction officers and staff assigned to the facility are male, which has been identified in reports and investigations as a contributing factor in cases of sexual abuse and misconduct involving female detainees.

Sexual abuse of women in correctional facilities violates both federal and state law, as well as the constitutional rights of incarcerated individuals. Survivors may have the right to pursue civil claims against correction officers, supervisors, and the government agencies responsible for operating the facility. If you or a loved one experienced sexual abuse while incarcerated at the Rose M. Singer Center, you may have legal options. Stephen Bilkis & Associates represents individuals in matters involving prisoner rights, jail conditions, and abuse in correctional facilities. The firm is led by managing partner Stephen Bilkis, who has been named a Super Lawyer, earned an Excellent rating from Avvo, been designated a Top-Rated Lawyer by Justia.com, and been included among the best lawyers in New York State by Expertise.com and TopLawyer.com. An experienced New York prisoner abuse lawyer can review the circumstances of the abuse and explain potential legal claims.

Examples of reported settlements include:

• $1.2 million settlement, May 1, 2017. Jane Does 1 and 2 reached a settlement with the City of New York after alleging that they were repeatedly raped by Correction Officer Benny Santiago while detained at the Rose M. Singer Center. 
• $425,000 settlement, October 7, 2018. A female detainee who wore a wire to expose sexual abuse by three Rikers Island correction officers received a settlement from the City of New York. The officers were accused of abusing her over a period of more than a year while she was incarcerated.
• $500,000 settlement , 2019. A former female detainee reached a settlement with the City of New York after filing a federal civil rights lawsuit alleging that she was raped by correction officers while incarcerated at the Rose M. Singer Center. 

What Types of Sexual Abuse Do Women Experience While Incarcerated?

Sexual abuse in local jails and state prisons can take many forms. At the Rose M. Singer Center, reports of abuse have included unwanted touching, sexual coercion, rape, forced sexual acts, and retaliation against individuals in custody who refuse sexual advances.

Correction officers are strictly prohibited from engaging in sexual conduct with incarcerated women. Because individuals in custody cannot legally consent to sexual activity with staff members, any sexual contact between correction officers and those they oversee is unlawful under federal and New York criminal law. See N.Y. Penal Law §§ 130.05(3)(f), 130.25(2).

Abuse may occur through direct physical acts or through coercion. For example, a sexual act is considered coercive when a correction officer threatens punishment, disciplinary charges, or loss of privileges if an incarcerated woman refuses. In other situations, an officer may offer benefits such as access to commissary, phone privileges, or movement within the facility in exchange for sexual activity. In either situation, the conduct constitutes sexual abuse, and the survivor may have the right to seek compensation.

Survivors often face significant barriers when attempting to report abuse. Fear of retaliation, disbelief, or further punishment can discourage individuals from coming forward. In some cases, survivors have reported being placed in segregation or subjected to unfair disciplinary charges after reporting misconduct by correction officers. Contacting an experienced New York civil rights and prisoner abuse lawyer can help survivors understand their rights and take steps toward seeking justice. We approach these cases with understanding and sensitivity, recognizing the challenges survivors face while working to hold those responsible accountable.

What Duty Do Correctional Officials Have To Prevent Sexual Abuse?

Not only is it against the law for correction officers to engage in sexual contact with incarcerated individuals, correction officials also have a legal duty to protect people in their custody from violence and sexual assault. This duty applies with particular importance in facilities housing women, including the Rose M. Singer Center, where officials are responsible for protecting female detainees from sexual abuse by both staff and other incarcerated individuals.

Courts have recognized that correctional officials may be held liable when they fail to protect incarcerated individuals from known risks of abuse. In Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994), the United States Supreme Court held that prison officials may be liable when they are deliberately indifferent to a substantial risk of serious harm. Depending on the circumstances and the custody status of the survivor, claims involving sexual abuse in correctional facilities may arise under either the Eighth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Liability may arise when correction officers directly commit abuse, but it can also arise when supervisors or administrators fail to address known patterns of misconduct. If correctional leadership ignores complaints, fails to investigate allegations, or allows officers with a history of abuse to continue working with incarcerated individuals, the responsible government entities may also be held accountable.

If you or a loved one experienced sexual abuse while incarcerated, contacting an experienced New York prisoner abuse lawyer can help you pursue claims not only against the individual who committed the abuse, but also against other correction officers, supervisors, and government entities that were responsible for your safety and failed to protect you.

How Can Correction Officers Be Held Liable for Sexual Abuse?

Correction officers may be held liable for sexual abuse when their conduct violates an incarcerated individual’s constitutional rights. Under federal law, survivors may bring claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on violations of the Eighth Amendment (for convicted prisoners) or the Fourteenth Amendment (for pretrial detainees), depending on their custody status. In facilities housing women, these claims often involve patterns of misconduct directed at female detainees and failures by staff to respond to repeated complaints.

Sexual abuse by correction officers is illegal and is a serious misuse of their power. Correction officers are not allowed to have any sexual contact with incarcerated individuals. Examples of this type of misconduct may include:

• Groping or unwanted sexual touching
• Coercing incarcerated individuals to perform sexual acts
• Rape or forced sexual intercourse
• Threatening punishment if sexual demands are refused
• Retaliating against incarcerated individuals who report abuse

Courts have recognized that sexual abuse of incarcerated individuals by correction officers may violate the Constitution. In Boddie v. Schnieder, 105 F.3d 857 (2d Cir. 1997), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit explained that sexual abuse by a correction officer can, in some circumstances, rise to the level of cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment. Although the court dismissed the claim in that case because the alleged conduct was not sufficiently serious, it confirmed that more severe or repetitive sexual abuse may support liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. While Boddie involved an Eighth Amendment claim brought by a convicted prisoner, courts have also recognized constitutional protections against sexual abuse for pretrial detainees under the Fourteenth Amendment.

Liability is not limited to the individual officer who committed the abuse. Supervisors and government entities may also be held responsible where there is evidence of a pattern of misconduct, failure to investigate complaints, or deliberate indifference to known risks of sexual abuse within the facility.

An experienced New York civil rights lawyer can help survivors evaluate these claims and determine the best course of action. Legal action may allow survivors to pursue accountability and compensation from both individual correction officers and the government entities responsible for the conditions that allowed the abuse to occur.

What Legal Duties Do Correctional Officials Have to Protect Prisoners from Sexual Abuse?

Correctional officials also have a duty to protect incarcerated individuals from sexual assault by both staff members and other incarcerated individuals. When jail officials know that an individual is at risk of assault but fail to take reasonable steps to protect them, the government may be liable for resulting injuries.

In facilities housing women, including the Rose M. Singer Center, officials may be aware of risks based on factors such as:

• Prior reports of sexual abuse or harassment involving specific correction officers or incarcerated individuals
• Complaints by female detainees about inappropriate conduct, coercion, or threats
• Patterns of misconduct or prior incidents involving staff assigned to supervise female detainees
• Reports of unsafe housing conditions

In women’s facilities, officials must also address risks unique to female detainees, including prior reports of harassment or abuse within housing units. If officials ignore these warnings or fail to take reasonable protective measures, survivors may be able to pursue civil rights claims under federal and state law.

Protective measures may include:

• Separating individuals who pose a risk to one another
• Reassigning or removing staff members accused of misconduct from direct contact with detainees
• Increasing supervision in housing areas
• Investigating reports of threats, harassment, or prior incidents
• Transferring vulnerable detainees to safer housing units when appropriate

Sexual abuse claims involving the Rose M. Singer Center often require a careful investigation into what correctional officials knew, when they knew it, and what actions they took in response. In many cases, responsibility may extend beyond the individual who committed the abuse to include other correction officers, supervisors, administrators, and government entities that failed to protect women in their custody. When evaluating these cases, we look closely at prior complaints, disciplinary histories, investigative records, staffing practices, and other evidence that may reveal whether warning signs were ignored. An experienced New York prisoner abuse lawyer can help determine who may be legally responsible and pursue accountability from all parties whose actions or failures contributed to the abuse.

How Does the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act Apply to Sexual Abuse Cases?

In some situations, survivors of sexual abuse may also bring claims under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act (GMVA), N.Y.C. Administrative Code § 10-1104. The GMVA is particularly relevant in cases involving sexual abuse of women, as it recognizes violence motivated by gender and allows survivors to pursue civil claims based on that conduct.  The GMVA allows survivors of gender-motivated violence to bring civil lawsuits against individuals who commit acts of violence motivated by gender. Sexual assault is widely recognized as a form of gender-motivated violence. 

Key provisions of the GMVA include:

• The ability to take legal action in court against the person who committed the abuse
• The ability to recover compensation for sexual assault and other serious abuse
• The ability to hold others responsible if their actions or failure to act allowed the abuse to happen
• Additional time to file a lawsuit through specific lookback windows created by New York City law, which may allow claims based on abuse that occurred years earlier 

The GMVA may be particularly important for women who were sexually abused at the Rose M. Singer Center years ago. In January 2026, New York City enacted legislation creating a new lookback window that allows certain survivors of gender-motivated violence additional time to pursue claims that might otherwise be barred by the statute of limitations. Because the scope and deadlines associated with these provisions can be complex, survivors should consult an experienced New York prisoner abuse lawyer as soon as possible to determine whether they may qualify.

What Is Required to File a Claim Against the City of New York?

When sexual abuse occurs at a New York City jail such as the Rose M. Singer Center, legal claims may be brought against both the individual correction officers or other persons involved and the City of New York. Because the Department of Correction is a municipal agency, specific procedural rules apply when bringing a claim against the City. These requirements differ from those that apply to claims against private individuals.

To pursue many claims against the City of New York, a Notice of Claim is often required. Under New York General Municipal Law § 50-e, a Notice of Claim generally must be filed with the New York City Comptroller within 90 days of the incident.

Failure to file a timely Notice of Claim may result in dismissal of certain claims against the City of New York. Because these requirements are strictly enforced, it is important to act quickly after an incident. However, claims brought under the New York City Gender-Motivated Violence Act may be governed by different procedural requirements and filing deadlines than traditional state law claims. In addition, recent amendments to the GMVA created a new lookback window that may allow certain survivors to pursue claims based on abuse that occurred years earlier. Because the interaction between the GMVA, municipal liability rules, and filing deadlines can be complex, survivors should consult an experienced New York prisoner abuse lawyer as soon as possible to determine what deadlines and procedural requirements apply to their particular case.

Can I File a Civil Rights Claim for Sexual Abuse in Jail?

Survivors of sexual abuse in correctional facilities may bring federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. These claims focus on whether government officials violated a person’s constitutional rights while acting under color of law.

Before filing a federal civil rights lawsuit, incarcerated individuals are generally required to follow the jail’s internal grievance process. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a prisoner must typically “exhaust” all available administrative remedies before bringing a claim in court. This means reporting the abuse through the facility’s grievance system and allowing the jail an opportunity to respond. Courts have recognized that administrative remedies must be “available” in order to be required, and in some cases involving sexual abuse, grievance procedures may be found unavailable due to intimidation, threats, or lack of meaningful access. In many cases involving sexual abuse at Rose Singer, disputes arise over whether the grievance process was properly followed or whether it was effectively unavailable due to fear of retaliation or lack of meaningful access.

Sexual abuse by correction officers may violate:

• The Eighth Amendment, which protects against cruel and unusual punishment
• The Fourteenth Amendment, which protects pretrial detainees from unconstitutional conditions of confinement

Civil rights claims may be brought against:

• Correction officers who committed the abuse
• Other correction officers who witnessed the abuse and failed to intervene
• Supervisors or administrators who ignored complaints or failed to act
• Municipal agencies responsible for policies, practices, or conditions that allowed the abuse to occur

An experienced New York prisoner abuse lawyer can evaluate whether a civil rights claim applies and help pursue action against all responsible parties.

What Damages May Be Available After Sexual Abuse in Jail?

Survivors of sexual abuse while incarcerated may be entitled to seek compensation for the harm they suffered. The types of damages available will depend on the facts of the case and the legal claims asserted, including civil rights claims and claims brought under New York law.

Damages may include:

• Compensation for physical injuries resulting from the abuse
• Compensation for emotional distress, trauma, and psychological harm
• Pain and suffering caused by the abuse
• Medical and mental health treatment related to the abuse
• Additional damages intended to hold the wrongdoer accountable for egregious conduct

An experienced prisoner abuse lawyer in New York can evaluate the available damages based on the specific facts of the case and pursue full compensation from all responsible parties.

Contact Stephen Bilkis & Associates

Women incarcerated at the Rose M. Singer Center, the facility for female detainees on Rikers Island, may face serious risks of sexual abuse, coercion, and misconduct by correction officers or other staff. Women who were sexually abused while incarcerated may have the right to seek justice through civil claims against the individuals responsible and the government entities that allowed the abuse to occur.

The experienced prisoner abuse attorneys serving New York at Stephen Bilkis & Associates represent individuals in matters involving prisoner rights, jail conditions, and treatment of incarcerated individuals. The firm is led by managing partner Stephen Bilkis, who was named a Super Lawyer, is rated Excellent by Avvo, recognized as a Top-Rated Lawyer by Justia.com, and listed among the best lawyers in New York State by Expertise.com and TopLawyer.com.

If you or a loved one experienced sexual abuse while incarcerated at the Rose M. Singer Center at Rikers Island, contact us at 800.696.9529 to schedule a free, no obligation consultation regarding your case. We represent clients in the following locations: Bronx, Brooklyn, Long Island, Manhattan, Westchester County, Nassau County, Queens, Staten Island, and Suffolk County.